| 1 | \documentclass{article} |
|---|
| 2 | \usepackage{fullpage} |
|---|
| 3 | \newcommand{\PSbox}[3]{\mbox{\rule{0in}{#3}\special{psfile=#1}\hspace{#2}}} |
|---|
| 4 | \begin{document} |
|---|
| 5 | \begin{enumerate} |
|---|
| 6 | \item Heat conduction and diffusion in alloy casting |
|---|
| 7 | |
|---|
| 8 | \begin{enumerate} |
|---|
| 9 | \item This was a bit confusing because we used a single coefficient $h$ to |
|---|
| 10 | describe both convective transfer from the mold to the environment, and |
|---|
| 11 | also conduction through the mold. |
|---|
| 12 | |
|---|
| 13 | That said, for pseudo-steady-state conduction, temperature is linear across |
|---|
| 14 | the solid metal, varying between (unknown) $T_s$ at the mold-metal |
|---|
| 15 | interface and $T_m$ at the melt interface. The Biot number $hY/k$ |
|---|
| 16 | determines the ratio of temperature differences: |
|---|
| 17 | $$\frac{hY}{k} = \frac{T_m-T_s}{T_s-T_{env}}.$$ |
|---|
| 18 | For a small Biot number, this ratio will be small, putting $T_s$ closer to |
|---|
| 19 | $T_m$; for a large Biot number, $T_s$ wil be closer to $T_{env}$. So your |
|---|
| 20 | small- and large-Biot number sketches should have looked something like: |
|---|
| 21 | \begin{center} |
|---|
| 22 | \PSbox{casting-a.ps}{190pt}{137pt} |
|---|
| 23 | \PSbox{casting-b.ps}{190pt}{137pt} |
|---|
| 24 | \end{center} |
|---|
| 25 | |
|---|
| 26 | \item Start with a heat balance at a moving melt interface (from the equation |
|---|
| 27 | sheet): |
|---|
| 28 | $$|q_\ell| - |q_s| = -U\rho\Delta H_f$$ |
|---|
| 29 | where $U=dY/dt$, the velocity of the melt interface. Because the liquid |
|---|
| 30 | temperature is uniform, there's no temperature gradient there, and no flux, |
|---|
| 31 | so $q_\ell=0$. This leaves us with the solid, where $q_s=k_sdT/dx$. But |
|---|
| 32 | since we don't know $T_m-T_s$ very well (see the left graph above), we can |
|---|
| 33 | instead use the expression given in the problem, simplified since |
|---|
| 34 | $T_s\simeq T_m$: |
|---|
| 35 | $$q_s = h(T_s-T_{env}) \simeq h(T_m-T_{env})$$ |
|---|
| 36 | This gives us: |
|---|
| 37 | $$\frac{dY}{dt} = U = \frac{h(T_m-T_{env})}{\rho\Delta H_f}$$ |
|---|
| 38 | This leads to a roughly constant front velocity, and linear growth of the |
|---|
| 39 | solid layer. |
|---|
| 40 | |
|---|
| 41 | \item For long times (large Biot number), growth is limited by conduction |
|---|
| 42 | through the solid metal, and $T_s\simeq T_{env}$. In this case, we can use |
|---|
| 43 | the pseudo-steady-state approximation to estimate the temperature gradient |
|---|
| 44 | to give the heat flux as: |
|---|
| 45 | $$q_s=-k_s\frac{\partial T}{\partial x} = -k_s\frac{T_m-T_s}{Y} \simeq |
|---|
| 46 | -k_s\frac{T_m-T_{env}}{Y}.$$ |
|---|
| 47 | This too goes into the melt interface heat balance, giving the |
|---|
| 48 | solidification rate: |
|---|
| 49 | $$\frac{dY}{dt} = \frac{k_s(T_m-T_{env})}{Y\rho\Delta H_f}$$ |
|---|
| 50 | Solving this differential equation gives $Y\propto\sqrt{t}$. |
|---|
| 51 | |
|---|
| 52 | \item This sketch should have included combined and parabolic growth rates |
|---|
| 53 | something like: |
|---|
| 54 | ({\em e.g.} oxidation): |
|---|
| 55 | \begin{center} |
|---|
| 56 | \PSbox{growth3.ps}{172pt}{115pt} |
|---|
| 57 | \end{center} |
|---|
| 58 | |
|---|
| 59 | \item This part involves solute diffusion in a moving frame of reference, |
|---|
| 60 | which gives us convective mass transfer. We start with the equation for |
|---|
| 61 | diffusion in a moving body (from the equation sheet): |
|---|
| 62 | $$\frac{\partial C}{\partial t} + u_x\frac{\partial C}{\partial x'} = |
|---|
| 63 | D\frac{\partial^2 C}{\partial x'^2} + G.$$ |
|---|
| 64 | This is steady-state, so $\partial C/\partial t=0$, and in a metal alloy, |
|---|
| 65 | the species are elements which aren't created or destroyed, so $G=0$. |
|---|
| 66 | We're left with an ordinary differential equation: |
|---|
| 67 | $$D\frac{d^2C}{dx'^2} - u_x\frac{dC}{dx'} = 0$$ |
|---|
| 68 | As a homogeneous equation with constant coefficients, we can solve this by |
|---|
| 69 | assuming a solution of the form $C=e^{Rx'}$ and solve for $R$: |
|---|
| 70 | $$DR^2e^{Rx'} - u_xRe^{Rx'} = 0$$ |
|---|
| 71 | $$R(DR-u_x) = 0$$ |
|---|
| 72 | $$R=0\ \ {\rm or}\ \ R=\frac{u_x}{D}$$ |
|---|
| 73 | $$C=A\exp\left(\frac{u_x}{D}x'\right) + B$$ |
|---|
| 74 | |
|---|
| 75 | \item In the liquid, the concentration at the interface where $x'=0$ is |
|---|
| 76 | $5C_L$; a long way from the interface (at $x'=\infty$), $C=C_L$. Taking |
|---|
| 77 | the second condition first, and noting that $u_x$ is negative (since the |
|---|
| 78 | interface is moving in the positive $x$-direction): |
|---|
| 79 | $$C_L = Ae^{-\infty} + B\ \Rightarrow\ B=C_L,$$ |
|---|
| 80 | then the first condition: |
|---|
| 81 | $$5C_L = Ae^0 + C_L\ \Rightarrow\ A=4C_L;$$ |
|---|
| 82 | $$C = 4C_L\exp\left(\frac{u_x}{D}x'\right) + C_L.$$ |
|---|
| 83 | |
|---|
| 84 | \item The order-of-magnitude thickness of the high-concentration layer ends |
|---|
| 85 | where the argument of the exponential is $-1$ (for simplicity): |
|---|
| 86 | $$\frac{u_x}{D}x'=-1\ \Rightarrow\ x'=-\frac{D}{u_x}.$$ |
|---|
| 87 | To get the thickness to a specific tolerance, {\em e.g.} the 1\% criterion |
|---|
| 88 | like a boundary layer, we just multiply this by a constant such as |
|---|
| 89 | $\ln(0.01)$. |
|---|
| 90 | \end{enumerate} |
|---|
| 91 | \end{enumerate} |
|---|
| 92 | \end{document} |
|---|