| 1 | \documentclass{article} |
|---|
| 2 | \usepackage{fullpage} |
|---|
| 3 | \begin{document} |
|---|
| 4 | \begin{enumerate} |
|---|
| 5 | \item Freezing by radiation and convection |
|---|
| 6 | |
|---|
| 7 | \begin{enumerate} |
|---|
| 8 | \item The thermal conductivity is given by the Wiedmann-Franz law: |
|---|
| 9 | $$k_{el}=L\sigma_{el}T = 2.45\times10^{-8} \frac{\rm W\Omega}{\rm K^2}\cdot |
|---|
| 10 | 5\times10^{5} (\Omega\cdot {\rm m})^{-1}\cdot 1800{\rm K} = |
|---|
| 11 | 22\frac{\rm W}{\rm m\cdot K}.$$ |
|---|
| 12 | |
|---|
| 13 | \item Total flux away from the top surface is radiative plus convective |
|---|
| 14 | ($T_s$ is top surface temperature): |
|---|
| 15 | $$q_{total}=q_{rad}+q_{conv} = \epsilon\alpha_{env}\sigma (T_s^4-T_{env}^4) |
|---|
| 16 | + h (T_s-T_{env}).$$ |
|---|
| 17 | |
|---|
| 18 | \item \label{htotal} If the environment is much colder, then $T_s\gg T_{env}$ |
|---|
| 19 | so $T_{env}\simeq 0$. If it is ``black'', then its absorbtivity is one. |
|---|
| 20 | So the above expression simplifies to |
|---|
| 21 | $$q_{total}=\epsilon\sigma T_s^4 + hT_s = h_{total}T_s,$$ |
|---|
| 22 | $$h_{total}=\epsilon\sigma T_s^3 + h = 200+100\frac{\rm W}{\rm m^2\cdot K} |
|---|
| 23 | = 300\frac{\rm W}{\rm m^2\cdot K}.$$ |
|---|
| 24 | |
|---|
| 25 | \item Set the Biot number to 0.1 and solve for $Y$ using $h_{total}$: |
|---|
| 26 | $${\rm Bi}=\frac{h_{total}Y}{k}=0.1 \Rightarrow Y=\frac{0.1k}{h_{total}}= |
|---|
| 27 | \frac{\rm0.1\cdot 22\frac{W}{m\cdot K}}{\rm300\frac{W}{m^2\cdot K}}= |
|---|
| 28 | 0.0073{\rm m(7.3mm)}.$$ |
|---|
| 29 | |
|---|
| 30 | \item \label{rate} You're given an equation relating flux to solidification |
|---|
| 31 | rate, so solve it for $dY/dt$: |
|---|
| 32 | $$q_L-q_S=\rho\Delta H_f\frac{dY}{dt}\Rightarrow |
|---|
| 33 | \frac{dY}{dt}=\frac{q_L-q_S}{\rho\Delta H_f}.$$ |
|---|
| 34 | Since liquid metal temperature is uniform, $q_L=0$. At quasi-steady-state, |
|---|
| 35 | the flux through the solid is equal to the flux leaving its top surface, |
|---|
| 36 | which is $h_{total}T_s$, $T_s$ being the surface temperature. Since the |
|---|
| 37 | metal temperature is roughly uniform, $T_s\simeq T_m$ so we can use that: |
|---|
| 38 | $$\frac{dY}{dt}=\frac{h_{total}T_m}{\rho\Delta H_f}= |
|---|
| 39 | \frac{\rm300\frac{W}{m^2\cdot K}\cdot1800K} |
|---|
| 40 | {\rm7500\frac{kg}{m^3}\cdot2.67\times10^5\frac{J}{kg}}= |
|---|
| 41 | 2.7\times10^{-4}\frac{\rm m}{\rm s}.$$ |
|---|
| 42 | The time required to reach the thickness calculated above of 7.3mm is that |
|---|
| 43 | divided by the rate calculated here, or about 27 seconds. |
|---|
| 44 | |
|---|
| 45 | \item We have resistances in series, due to conduction through the solid and |
|---|
| 46 | radiation/convection from the surface. So the heat flux in the solid |
|---|
| 47 | goes like: |
|---|
| 48 | $$q_s=\frac{T_m-T_{env}}{\frac{Y}{k_s}+\frac{1}{h_{total}}}.$$ |
|---|
| 49 | The trouble is, $h_{total}$ is a function of the surface temperature $T_s$, |
|---|
| 50 | which is somewhere between $T_{env}$ and $T_m$. We can relate $T_s$ to the |
|---|
| 51 | conductive flux, which is the same as the flux $q$ above: |
|---|
| 52 | $$q_s=k_s\frac{T_m-T_s}{Y}\Rightarrow T_s=T_m-\frac{qY}{k_s}.$$ |
|---|
| 53 | We plug this into the $h_{total}$ expression from part \ref{htotal}: |
|---|
| 54 | $$h_{total} = \epsilon\sigma T_s^3 + h = |
|---|
| 55 | \epsilon\sigma\left(T_m-\frac{qY}{k_s}\right)^3 + h,$$ |
|---|
| 56 | then plug that into the heat flux: |
|---|
| 57 | $$q_s=\frac{T_m-T_{env}}{\frac{Y}{k_s}+ |
|---|
| 58 | \frac{1}{\epsilon\sigma\left(T_m-\frac{q_sY}{k_s}\right)^3 + h}}.$$ |
|---|
| 59 | To complete this analysis, one would need to solve this for $q_s$ (probably |
|---|
| 60 | numerically), and use that in the solidification rate equation from part |
|---|
| 61 | \ref{rate}. |
|---|
| 62 | \end{enumerate} |
|---|
| 63 | \end{enumerate} |
|---|
| 64 | \end{document} |
|---|
| 65 | |
|---|
| 66 | |
|---|
| 67 | |
|---|