| 1 | \documentclass{article} |
|---|
| 2 | \usepackage{fullpage} |
|---|
| 3 | \begin{document} |
|---|
| 4 | \begin{enumerate} |
|---|
| 5 | \item CD Injection Molding I: Navier-Stokes |
|---|
| 6 | |
|---|
| 7 | \begin{enumerate} |
|---|
| 8 | \item Assumptions which could be made here included: |
|---|
| 9 | \begin{itemize} |
|---|
| 10 | \item Newtonian behavior with uniform viscosity (since that was given). |
|---|
| 11 | \item Incompressible flow with uniform density; this and the previous |
|---|
| 12 | assumption permitted use of the simpler closed-form Newtonian |
|---|
| 13 | Navier-Stokes equations. |
|---|
| 14 | \item Laminar flow (with small thickness and high viscosity this is |
|---|
| 15 | reasonable). |
|---|
| 16 | \item Steady-state (given); time derivatives are all zero. |
|---|
| 17 | \item Fully-developed (given as short entrance length); flow is purely |
|---|
| 18 | radial, $u_\theta=u_z=0$. But velocity derivatives in the flow direction |
|---|
| 19 | (the $r$-direction) are {\em not} zero, as conservation of mass requires |
|---|
| 20 | that there be faster flow near the center and slower flow near the |
|---|
| 21 | outside. |
|---|
| 22 | \item Edge effects and axisymmetric are the same thing here; velocity |
|---|
| 23 | derivatives in the $\theta$ direction are zero. |
|---|
| 24 | \item Gravity acts in the negative $z$-direction; $F_r=F_\theta=0$, |
|---|
| 25 | $F_z=-\rho g$. |
|---|
| 26 | \end{itemize} |
|---|
| 27 | |
|---|
| 28 | \item Since $u_\theta=u_z=0$ (because flow is axisymmetric and |
|---|
| 29 | fully-developed), the mass conservation equation reduces to: |
|---|
| 30 | $$\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r} \left(ru_r\right) = 0.$$ |
|---|
| 31 | Steady-state, fully-developed, axisymmetric, and $F_r=0$ reduce the |
|---|
| 32 | $r$-momentum equation to: |
|---|
| 33 | $$\rho u_r\frac{\partial u_r}{\partial r}= - \frac{\partial p}{\partial r} |
|---|
| 34 | + \mu\left[\frac{\partial}{\partial r}\left(\frac{1}{r} |
|---|
| 35 | \frac{\partial}{\partial r}\left(ru_r\right)\right) |
|---|
| 36 | + \frac{\partial^2u_r}{\partial z^2}\right].$$ |
|---|
| 37 | With a bit more sophistication, one might realize that the $r$-derivative |
|---|
| 38 | in the viscosity term is just a derivative of what we found to be zero in |
|---|
| 39 | the mass equation, so that too could be eliminated. |
|---|
| 40 | |
|---|
| 41 | The $\theta$-momentum equation is almost completely eliminated: |
|---|
| 42 | $$0 = -\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial p}{\partial\theta},$$ |
|---|
| 43 | so there are no pressure gradients in the $\theta$-direction, and the |
|---|
| 44 | $z$-momentum equation only has pressure gradients due to weight of the |
|---|
| 45 | polymer: |
|---|
| 46 | $$0 = -\frac{\partial p}{\partial z} + F_z |
|---|
| 47 | \left(= -\frac{\partial p}{\partial z} - \rho g\right).$$ |
|---|
| 48 | \end{enumerate} |
|---|
| 49 | \end{enumerate} |
|---|
| 50 | \end{document} |
|---|