root/trunk/matml/transport/problems/cdmold1/cdmold1-solution.tex

Revision 63, 2.3 kB (checked in by powell, 5 years ago)

New problem: CD injection molding I: Navier-Stokes

  • Property svn:keywords set to Author Date Id Revision
Line 
1\documentclass{article}
2\usepackage{fullpage}
3\begin{document}
4\begin{enumerate}
5\item CD Injection Molding I: Navier-Stokes
6
7  \begin{enumerate}
8  \item Assumptions which could be made here included:
9    \begin{itemize}
10    \item Newtonian behavior with uniform viscosity (since that was given).
11    \item Incompressible flow with uniform density; this and the previous
12      assumption permitted use of the simpler closed-form Newtonian
13      Navier-Stokes equations.
14    \item Laminar flow (with small thickness and high viscosity this is
15      reasonable).
16    \item Steady-state (given); time derivatives are all zero.
17    \item Fully-developed (given as short entrance length); flow is purely
18      radial, $u_\theta=u_z=0$.  But velocity derivatives in the flow direction
19      (the $r$-direction) are {\em not} zero, as conservation of mass requires
20      that there be faster flow near the center and slower flow near the
21      outside.
22    \item Edge effects and axisymmetric are the same thing here; velocity
23      derivatives in the $\theta$ direction are zero.
24    \item Gravity acts in the negative $z$-direction; $F_r=F_\theta=0$,
25      $F_z=-\rho g$.
26    \end{itemize}
27
28  \item Since $u_\theta=u_z=0$ (because flow is axisymmetric and
29    fully-developed), the mass conservation equation reduces to:
30    $$\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r} \left(ru_r\right) = 0.$$
31    Steady-state, fully-developed, axisymmetric, and $F_r=0$ reduce the
32    $r$-momentum equation to:
33    $$\rho u_r\frac{\partial u_r}{\partial r}= - \frac{\partial p}{\partial r}
34    + \mu\left[\frac{\partial}{\partial r}\left(\frac{1}{r}
35        \frac{\partial}{\partial r}\left(ru_r\right)\right)
36      + \frac{\partial^2u_r}{\partial z^2}\right].$$
37    With a bit more sophistication, one might realize that the $r$-derivative
38    in the viscosity term is just a derivative of what we found to be zero in
39    the mass equation, so that too could be eliminated.
40
41    The $\theta$-momentum equation is almost completely eliminated:
42    $$0 = -\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial p}{\partial\theta},$$
43    so there are no pressure gradients in the $\theta$-direction, and the
44    $z$-momentum equation only has pressure gradients due to weight of the
45    polymer:
46    $$0 = -\frac{\partial p}{\partial z} + F_z
47    \left(= -\frac{\partial p}{\partial z} - \rho g\right).$$
48  \end{enumerate}
49\end{enumerate}
50\end{document}
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the browser.