| 1 | \documentclass{article} |
|---|
| 2 | \usepackage{fullpage} |
|---|
| 3 | \newcommand{\PSbox}[3]{\mbox{\rule{0in}{#3}\special{psfile=#1}\hspace{#2}}} |
|---|
| 4 | \begin{document} |
|---|
| 5 | \begin{enumerate} |
|---|
| 6 | \item Encapsulated liposomes for long-term drug delivery |
|---|
| 7 | |
|---|
| 8 | \begin{enumerate} |
|---|
| 9 | \item The ``thickness'' of the encapsulant is $R_2-R_1=0.01$ cm, so |
|---|
| 10 | $$\frac{\rm thickness^2}{D}= |
|---|
| 11 | \frac{\rm (0.01 cm)^2}{\rm 10^{-7}\frac{cm^2}{sec}}={\rm 1000 seconds}$$ |
|---|
| 12 | This is short compared to the service life of the device (for any |
|---|
| 13 | definition of ``long-term''), so we can safely assume quasi-steady-state |
|---|
| 14 | diffusion in the encapsulant. |
|---|
| 15 | |
|---|
| 16 | \item It's worth pointing out that ``lipid bilayer membrane'' means two |
|---|
| 17 | molecular layers, so the membrane is {\em really} thin ({\em i.e.} |
|---|
| 18 | submicron, ask a biomat person for molecular details). |
|---|
| 19 | |
|---|
| 20 | \hspace{1.1in}Membrane-controlled \hspace{1.4in}Diffusion-controlled |
|---|
| 21 | |
|---|
| 22 | \hspace{.2in} |
|---|
| 23 | \PSbox{encapmem.ps}{190pt}{135pt} |
|---|
| 24 | \PSbox{encapdiff.ps}{190pt}{135pt} |
|---|
| 25 | |
|---|
| 26 | \item \label{eldiffeq} The universal conservation equation: |
|---|
| 27 | $$\rm accumulation=in-out+generation$$ |
|---|
| 28 | Steady state indicates accumulation=0, there should be no generation term. |
|---|
| 29 | We'll use a spherical ``shell'' of thickness $\Delta r$: |
|---|
| 30 | $$0 = \left[A\cdot J_r\right]_r - \left[A\cdot J_r\right]_{r+\Delta r}$$ |
|---|
| 31 | $$0 = \left[4\pi r^2\cdot J_r\right]_r - |
|---|
| 32 | \left[4\pi r^2\cdot J_r\right]_{r+\Delta r}$$ |
|---|
| 33 | Divide by $4\pi\Delta r$, let $\Delta r$ go to zero: |
|---|
| 34 | $$0 = -\frac{d}{dr}(r^2J_r)$$ |
|---|
| 35 | Substitute $J_r=-D\frac{dC}{dr}$: |
|---|
| 36 | $$0 = \frac{d}{dr}\left(Dr^2\frac{dC}{dr}\right)$$ |
|---|
| 37 | For constant $D$, we divide by $D$ and are left with: |
|---|
| 38 | $$0 = \frac{d}{dr}\left(r^2\frac{dC}{dr}\right).$$ |
|---|
| 39 | |
|---|
| 40 | \item \label{solut} Start from the equation in part \ref{eldiffeq} and |
|---|
| 41 | integrate: |
|---|
| 42 | $$-A = r^2\frac{dC}{dr}$$ |
|---|
| 43 | ($A$ is an arbitrary constant, negative here because we'll make it positive |
|---|
| 44 | below.) Divide by $r^2$ and integrate again to yield the general solution: |
|---|
| 45 | $$C = \frac{A}{r} + B$$ |
|---|
| 46 | Now apply the boundary conditions from above: |
|---|
| 47 | $$C_2 = \frac{A}{R_1} + B$$ |
|---|
| 48 | $$0 = \frac{A}{R_2} + B$$ |
|---|
| 49 | There are a couple of ways to go from here. I like to subtract the second |
|---|
| 50 | from the first to eliminate $B$, this gives |
|---|
| 51 | $$C_2 = \frac{A}{R_1} - \frac{A}{R_2} |
|---|
| 52 | = A \left(\frac{1}{R_1} - \frac{1}{R_2}\right)$$ |
|---|
| 53 | $$A = \frac{C_2}{\frac{1}{R_1} - \frac{1}{R_2}}$$ |
|---|
| 54 | Then from the second BC: |
|---|
| 55 | $$0 = \frac{C_2}{\frac{1}{R_1} - \frac{1}{R_2}} \frac{1}{R_2} + B$$ |
|---|
| 56 | $$B = -\frac{C_2/R_2}{\frac{1}{R_1}-\frac{1}{R_2}}$$ |
|---|
| 57 | Plugging this $A$ and $B$ into the general solution and dividing by $C_2$ |
|---|
| 58 | gives: |
|---|
| 59 | $$\frac{C}{C_2} = |
|---|
| 60 | \frac{\frac{1}{r} - \frac{1}{R_2}} {\frac{1}{R_1} - \frac{1}{R_2}}$$ |
|---|
| 61 | |
|---|
| 62 | \item\label{diffcont} We begin with the flux: |
|---|
| 63 | $$J_r = -D \frac{dC}{dr} = -D \frac{d}{dr} |
|---|
| 64 | \left[\frac{C_2}{\frac{1}{R_1} - \frac{1}{R_2}} |
|---|
| 65 | \left(\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_2}\right)\right]$$ |
|---|
| 66 | $$J_r=\frac{DC_2}{\frac{1}{R_1} - \frac{1}{R_2}}\cdot\frac{1}{r^2}$$ |
|---|
| 67 | The area $A$ is simply $4\pi r^2$, so when we multiply them the $r^2$s |
|---|
| 68 | cancel: |
|---|
| 69 | $$J_rA = \frac{4\pi DC_2}{\frac{1}{R_1} - \frac{1}{R_2}}$$ |
|---|
| 70 | This is independent of $r$. |
|---|
| 71 | |
|---|
| 72 | If this is diffusion-limited, then $C_2\simeq C_1$, and: |
|---|
| 73 | $$J_rA = \frac{4\pi DC_1}{\frac{1}{R_1} - \frac{1}{R_2}}$$ |
|---|
| 74 | Plugging in the problem parameters gives us: |
|---|
| 75 | $$J_rA = \frac{\rm4\pi \cdot 10^{-7}\frac{cm^2}{sec}} |
|---|
| 76 | {\rm \frac{1}{0.01cm} - \frac{1}{0.02cm}} \cdot C_1= |
|---|
| 77 | 2.5\times10^{-8}\frac{\rm cm^3}{\rm sec}C_1$$ |
|---|
| 78 | Since $C_1$ is in $\rm\frac{moles}{cm^3}$ or $\rm\frac{mg}{cm^3}$ etc., |
|---|
| 79 | this gives the overall rate of drug delivery from the device---if it's |
|---|
| 80 | diffusion-limited. |
|---|
| 81 | |
|---|
| 82 | \item\label{memcont} The flux equation was given, and here $C_2=0$ modifies |
|---|
| 83 | it slightly: |
|---|
| 84 | $$J_r=h_D(C_1-C_2)\simeq h_DC_1$$ |
|---|
| 85 | Because the membrane is at $R_1$, the relevant area $A$ is $4\pi R_1^2$, |
|---|
| 86 | which gives us: |
|---|
| 87 | $$J_r\cdot A = h_DC_1 \cdot 4\pi R_1^2 = |
|---|
| 88 | {\rm 4\pi\cdot(0.01cm)^2\cdot1.4\times10^{-6}\frac{cm}{s}}C_1 = |
|---|
| 89 | {\rm 1.8\times10^{-9}\frac{cm^3}{s}}C_1$$ |
|---|
| 90 | |
|---|
| 91 | \item Because the result of part \ref{memcont} is so much lower than that of |
|---|
| 92 | part \ref{diffcont}, the membrane definitely controls the rate of drug |
|---|
| 93 | delivery. The actual rate of delivery will thus be close to what's |
|---|
| 94 | predicted in part \ref{memcont}, or about |
|---|
| 95 | $2\times10^{-9}{\rm\frac{cm^3}{s}}C_1$. That's the end of the story as far |
|---|
| 96 | as diffusion is concerned, and the answer this question was looking for. |
|---|
| 97 | |
|---|
| 98 | However, if you read the reference given in the problem, you'll notice that |
|---|
| 99 | the drug delivery rate for the encapsulated liposomes is actually {\em |
|---|
| 100 | higher} than for the bare liposomes. This is because the encapsulation |
|---|
| 101 | process weakens the membrane so that it is not as effective a barrier as |
|---|
| 102 | without the encapsulant. |
|---|
| 103 | \end{enumerate} |
|---|
| 104 | \end{enumerate} |
|---|
| 105 | \end{document} |
|---|