| 1 | \documentclass{article} |
|---|
| 2 | \usepackage{fullpage} |
|---|
| 3 | \begin{document} |
|---|
| 4 | \begin{enumerate} |
|---|
| 5 | \item Molecular beam epitaxy deposition rate |
|---|
| 6 | |
|---|
| 7 | \begin{enumerate} |
|---|
| 8 | \item What I was looking for here was: |
|---|
| 9 | \begin{enumerate} |
|---|
| 10 | \item Use the Clausius-Clapeyron equation to calculate the vapor pressure |
|---|
| 11 | from the source temperature. |
|---|
| 12 | \item \label{meanfreepath} Use the background pressure and temperature to |
|---|
| 13 | estimate the mean free path of sublimating atoms in the chamber. |
|---|
| 14 | \item \label{knudsen} Calculate the Knudsen number, which is the ratio of |
|---|
| 15 | mean free path to chamber size. |
|---|
| 16 | \item If the Knudsen number is greater than one, calculate the sublimation |
|---|
| 17 | rate using the Langmuir equation. |
|---|
| 18 | \end{enumerate} |
|---|
| 19 | |
|---|
| 20 | Also, given the wording of the problem, another approach which answered the |
|---|
| 21 | stated question was to calculate the sublimation flux using a heat balance. |
|---|
| 22 | Assuming that the difference between flux in from the heat source (electron |
|---|
| 23 | beam) called $q_v$, and heat flux conducted through the solid into the |
|---|
| 24 | cooling water $q_s$, is all used to sublimate the atoms, this gives: |
|---|
| 25 | $$q_v-q_s = \delta H_s\cdot J \Rightarrow J = \frac{q_v-q_s}{\Delta H_s}.$$ |
|---|
| 26 | With that approach, steps \ref{meanfreepath} and \ref{knudsen} above were |
|---|
| 27 | still necessary. |
|---|
| 28 | |
|---|
| 29 | \item This implicitly assumed that electron beam power either went into |
|---|
| 30 | sublimation, or into the cooling water, so the flux balance is again given |
|---|
| 31 | by: |
|---|
| 32 | $$q_v-q_s = \Delta H_s\cdot J.$$ |
|---|
| 33 | The net power is then the next flux times the area: |
|---|
| 34 | $$P_{ebeam}-P_{water}=\Delta H_s\cdot J\cdot A.$$ |
|---|
| 35 | |
|---|
| 36 | \item If sublimation flux distribution follows a cosine distribution (like |
|---|
| 37 | radiating photons), and the sublimating atoms follow straight-line |
|---|
| 38 | trajectories through the chamber (like photons), then guess what? We can |
|---|
| 39 | use the radiation viewfactor to calculate the fraction of sublimating atoms |
|---|
| 40 | which land on the substrate. |
|---|
| 41 | |
|---|
| 42 | From here it's straightforward: $r_1=2$cm, $r_2=9$cm, $D=30$cm, so |
|---|
| 43 | $D/r_1=15$ (effectively $\infty$ on the viewfactor graph) and $r_2/D=0.3$, |
|---|
| 44 | giving $F_{12}\simeq0.1$. |
|---|
| 45 | |
|---|
| 46 | The ratio of deposition flux at the substrate to sublimation flux from the |
|---|
| 47 | source is this times the area ratio: |
|---|
| 48 | $$\frac{J_{subs}}{J_{source}}=\frac{A_1F_{12}}{A_2}= |
|---|
| 49 | \frac{\rm\pi(2cm)^2\cdot0.1}{\rm\pi(9cm)^2}\simeq0.005.$$ |
|---|
| 50 | \end{enumerate} |
|---|
| 51 | \end{enumerate} |
|---|
| 52 | \end{document} |
|---|