root/trunk/matml/transport/problems/mbe/mbe-solution.tex

Revision 65, 2.4 kB (checked in by powell, 6 years ago)

New problem: Molecular beam epitaxy deposition rate

  • Property svn:keywords set to Author Date Id Revision
Line 
1\documentclass{article}
2\usepackage{fullpage}
3\begin{document}
4\begin{enumerate}
5\item Molecular beam epitaxy deposition rate
6
7  \begin{enumerate}
8  \item What I was looking for here was:
9    \begin{enumerate}
10    \item Use the Clausius-Clapeyron equation to calculate the vapor pressure
11      from the source temperature.
12    \item \label{meanfreepath} Use the background pressure and temperature to
13      estimate the mean free path of sublimating atoms in the chamber.
14    \item \label{knudsen} Calculate the Knudsen number, which is the ratio of
15      mean free path to chamber size.
16    \item If the Knudsen number is greater than one, calculate the sublimation
17      rate using the Langmuir equation.
18    \end{enumerate}
19
20    Also, given the wording of the problem, another approach which answered the
21    stated question was to calculate the sublimation flux using a heat balance.
22    Assuming that the difference between flux in from the heat source (electron
23    beam) called $q_v$, and heat flux conducted through the solid into the
24    cooling water $q_s$, is all used to sublimate the atoms, this gives:
25    $$q_v-q_s = \delta H_s\cdot J \Rightarrow J = \frac{q_v-q_s}{\Delta H_s}.$$
26    With that approach, steps \ref{meanfreepath} and \ref{knudsen} above were
27    still necessary.
28
29  \item This implicitly assumed that electron beam power either went into
30    sublimation, or into the cooling water, so the flux balance is again given
31    by:
32    $$q_v-q_s = \Delta H_s\cdot J.$$
33    The net power is then the next flux times the area:
34    $$P_{ebeam}-P_{water}=\Delta H_s\cdot J\cdot A.$$
35
36  \item If sublimation flux distribution follows a cosine distribution (like
37    radiating photons), and the sublimating atoms follow straight-line
38    trajectories through the chamber (like photons), then guess what?  We can
39    use the radiation viewfactor to calculate the fraction of sublimating atoms
40    which land on the substrate.
41
42    From here it's straightforward: $r_1=2$cm, $r_2=9$cm, $D=30$cm, so
43    $D/r_1=15$ (effectively $\infty$ on the viewfactor graph) and $r_2/D=0.3$,
44    giving $F_{12}\simeq0.1$.
45
46    The ratio of deposition flux at the substrate to sublimation flux from the
47    source is this times the area ratio:
48    $$\frac{J_{subs}}{J_{source}}=\frac{A_1F_{12}}{A_2}=
49    \frac{\rm\pi(2cm)^2\cdot0.1}{\rm\pi(9cm)^2}\simeq0.005.$$
50  \end{enumerate}
51\end{enumerate}
52\end{document}
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the browser.