| 1 | \documentclass{article} |
|---|
| 2 | \usepackage{fullpage} |
|---|
| 3 | \begin{document} |
|---|
| 4 | \begin{enumerate} |
|---|
| 5 | \item Water etching of magnesium oxide ceramic MEMS parts |
|---|
| 6 | |
|---|
| 7 | It has been proposed that some MEMS (Micro Electro-Mechanical Systems) device |
|---|
| 8 | parts for high temperature applications could be made out of magnesium oxide |
|---|
| 9 | by water etching, due to the slight solubility of magnesium oxide in water. |
|---|
| 10 | The etching reaction is: |
|---|
| 11 | $$\rm MgO + H_2O\Rightarrow Mg^{2+} + 2 OH^-$$ |
|---|
| 12 | |
|---|
| 13 | A magnesium oxide plate 5 cm (0.05 m) long partially covered by a polymer |
|---|
| 14 | etching mask is placed in a water tank near an impeller which generates a |
|---|
| 15 | free stream water velocity of 1 m/s past the plate. |
|---|
| 16 | |
|---|
| 17 | \begin{center} |
|---|
| 18 | $\ $\pdfximage{mgetch.png}\pdfrefximage\pdflastximage$\ $ |
|---|
| 19 | \end{center} |
|---|
| 20 | |
|---|
| 21 | Data: |
|---|
| 22 | \begin{itemize} |
|---|
| 23 | \item Mg$^{2+}$ diffusivity in water: $D=10^{-5}\frac{\rm cm^2}{\rm s}$ |
|---|
| 24 | ($\rm =10^{-9}\frac{m^2}{s}$). |
|---|
| 25 | \item Mg$^{2+}$ solubility in this particular solution: |
|---|
| 26 | $C_s=\rm10^{-2}\frac{mol}{cm^3}$. |
|---|
| 27 | \end{itemize} |
|---|
| 28 | |
|---|
| 29 | \begin{enumerate} |
|---|
| 30 | \item \label{magsketch} Sketch the shapes of the velocity and diffusion |
|---|
| 31 | boundary layers above the plate on one sketch, clearly indicating which of |
|---|
| 32 | the two boundary layers will be larger. |
|---|
| 33 | |
|---|
| 34 | \item If the magnesium oxide dissolution is limited by mass transfer of |
|---|
| 35 | Mg$^{2+}$ ions away from the interface, will the dissolution rate be |
|---|
| 36 | uniform across the plate? If not, indicate on your sketch from part |
|---|
| 37 | \ref{magsketch} where on the plate you expect to see the highest and lowest |
|---|
| 38 | dissolution rates. |
|---|
| 39 | |
|---|
| 40 | \item \label{magdims} Calculate the dimensionless numbers on which the |
|---|
| 41 | Nusselt number depends using the whole length of the plate as your |
|---|
| 42 | lengthscale. |
|---|
| 43 | |
|---|
| 44 | \item \label{magnuss} Calculate the {\em local} Nusselt number Nu$_x$ at the |
|---|
| 45 | back end of the plate ($x=L$) based on your answers to part \ref{magdims}. |
|---|
| 46 | |
|---|
| 47 | \item Calculate the magnesium oxide dissolution rate at the back end of the |
|---|
| 48 | plate. Is this the largest or smallest dissolution rate you expect to see |
|---|
| 49 | over the plate? |
|---|
| 50 | |
|---|
| 51 | \item So you do the experiment, and the magnesium oxide dissolution is |
|---|
| 52 | uniform across the whole plate! Cool! Furthermore, the dissolution rate |
|---|
| 53 | is just one tenth of the minimum rate which your transport analysis had |
|---|
| 54 | predicted. Not so cool---but for high-value-added applications such as |
|---|
| 55 | this, quality is much more important than manufacturing cost so that's not |
|---|
| 56 | a problem. |
|---|
| 57 | |
|---|
| 58 | How could this have happened? (Hint: what assumption in this analysis |
|---|
| 59 | might have been violated?) |
|---|
| 60 | \end{enumerate} |
|---|
| 61 | \end{enumerate} |
|---|
| 62 | \end{document} |
|---|